Perspective

I have spent hours and thousands of words on this blog now, but sometimes it takes just a few minutes to regain perspective in life.  I took some unannounced down time with this writing intentionally so I could be certain that I wanted to continue and not just writing out of habit.

The conclusion I came to is that I must.  I don’t claim any special enlightenment or anything of that sort, but I will continue to endeavor to filter current events and social issues of the time through the lens of Truth.  I am unabashed and will continue to speak that Truth regardless if one or one thousand people read it because the Truth must be spoken and I am willing to bear it.

“Son of man, go now to the people of Israel and speak my words to them. You are not being sent to a people of obscure speech and strange language, but to the people of Israel— not to many peoples of obscure speech and strange language, whose words you cannot understand. Surely if I had sent you to them, they would have listened to you. But the people of Israel are not willing to listen to you because they are not willing to listen to me, for all the Israelites are hardened and obstinate. But I will make you as unyielding and hardened as they are. I will make your forehead like the hardest stone, harder than flint. Do not be afraid of them or terrified by them, though they are a rebellious people.”

Ezekiel 3:4-9

I want to revisit something I have written about extensively already – Benghazi and the attack and coverup of the murder of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other American citizens during an eight hour attack and siege of the consulate and nearby CIA annex.

In Scripture, David lured a married woman to bed with him and then in order to hide his indiscretion, he ordered her husband betrayed on the battlefield.  The fate of Uriah the Hittite in 2 Samuel 11 and Ambassador Stevens appears to be extremely similar and I for one firmly believe that we, as humans, are extremely prone to repeating history and the same mistakes and sins over and over throughout time.

What has been extensively written on and theorized, but not publicly avowed by the Administration, is that Ambassador Stevens was a conduit for the President, via the State Department, to provide weapons and aid, in contravention of United States Law and international treaties, to the Syrian rebels (Gamage, Information Clearing House; Kelley, Business Insider).

So the question still lingers – what purpose did denying reinforcements to Benghazi serve?  Qui bono?  What motive would the Ambassador’s death serve?

As I already explored only the National Command Authority can order the military – especially a theater commander – to stand down when a call of distress is issued.  So either Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta or President Barack Obama issued that order.  Again I ask qui bono?

For more on this issue and a full break down of the chain of command involved, as well as some more background on the odd way General Carter Ham (Commanding General, AFRICOM) was relieved of duty in the midst of the attack, I recommend more reading here.

Aggression

Today, the bellicose rhetoric coming out of North Korea has brought a new nation into the limelight.  While part of me believes that North Korea, failing to provoke the US or South Korea into something that they could then demonize or the world stage in order to leverage concessions (which is their usual approach to rhetorical confrontation), the other part of me thinks that their leadership is either wildly miscalculating the situation, or intentionally prefacing some action that they have already decided to take.  Why is a question that is impossible to answer from where I sit, but the cards on the table are growing more interesting and frightening.

First, the admission that even stunned the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was that North Korea has the technology and means to develop a ballistic-capable nuclear warhead.  This is a major, major problem.  This puts them far ahead of Iran in terms of geopolitical threat and as a destabilizing force on the world stage to any nation.  It is not a technologically challenging feat to mount a multi-stage rocket on to a seemingly benign cargo ship, sail it to within range of your target, tear away the fake hull and launch a nuclear tipped missile at your target.

They have increasingly elevated their rhetoric over the past weeks from the typical war preparation crud that they do every year or two and have openly stated the nuclear war is unavoidable.  Even the Soviets and the US at the height of the Cold War despite the thousands of nuclear and thermonuclear warheads aimed at each other were constrained by mutually assured destruction and a desire to SURVIVE and never explicitly threatened the launch and immolation of each others’ citizens, cities, infrastructure, or allies.  North Korea has done this – by explicitly naming Japan as their first target.

While some may ask if I believe this all to be words with no action to back it up?  It could be complete bluster on Pyongyang’s part.  And threatening Japan is not new to the North – they still hold a grudge over the invasion, occupation, and atrocities committed generations ago by the Imperial Japanese, but while others have forgiven and forged new ties with modern-day Japan, the North stubbornly clings to this bitterness and hate.

One of the most important lessons I have learned is that you must take into account the national culture of someone when trying to understand what makes them tick.  Chae-myun is basically what westerner’s think of as saving face in Korean.  It goes much deeper than that though in most Asian cultures.  Chae-myun is an obligation to one’s honor, to the honor of one’s family, and to the honor of one’s ancestors.  Going further, any action or behavior that could be interpreted by one as disrespectful, challenging, or confrontational towards someone (or in this case a nation) would be interpreted as an assault on that person’s (nation’s) dignity and honor.

At this point though, another aspect of chae-myun needs to be considered, and that is the directness and challenging speech emanating from North Korea is a direct threat to damage the cohesive of the Japanese-American-South Korean alliance.  Further, the North’s rhetoric is evidence of a lack of self-control and recklessness, which is paramount to maintaining the balance of mutually assured destruction as a limiting factor on the North’s behavior.  MAD relies on rational actors that genuinely are concerned about their own survival and do not wish to die in the decimation of total nuclear war (and all nuclear war is total).

So adding up all of the various threats, culture aspects, and actors involved, the North does not come across as rational in this case.  They are in possession of probably no more than a handful of nuclear bombs with the largest test yield being six kilotons of TNT equivalent.

For comparison, the bombs the US dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were between thirteen kilotons and twenty-two kilotons respectively, and just the United States alone has 650 B83 free-fall variable yield nuclear bombs with an upper yield of 1.2 megatons.  (Grand total the US as of November 2012, possesses 1,722 ready-to-deploy strategic nuclear warheads split between land-based, submarine-based, and aircraft-delivered bombs, with an estimated reserve of about 2,800 warheads, and 500 tactical yield warheads).

It’s not that North Korea is foolhardy, it’s that they’re toying with being labeled absolutely bat**** crazy.  What makes it even scarier is that crazy people are impossible to predict. 

Should we expect an attack?

Should Japan?

Never in the past have I thought so from North Korea until now.

The right to use force in self-defense arises in response to a hostile act (attack) and/or demonstrated hostile intent (threat of imminent attack).

Indicators of Hostile Intent

Aiming or directing weapons

Check

Adopting an attack profile

Check and Check

Closing within weapons release range

Check – Rodong-1 & -2, Musudan, and Taepodong-2 ballistic missiles have the range capable of striking Japan, Okinawa, and possibly the U.S. territory of Guam.

Illuminating with radar or laser designators

Not necessary with ballistic weaponry

Passing target information

Check


When I bring the sword against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their watchman, and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet to warn the people, then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not heed the warning and the sword comes and takes their life, their blood will be on their own head. Since they heard the sound of the trumpet but did not heed the warning, their blood will be on their own head. If they had heeded the warning, they would have saved themselves. But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes someone’s life, that person’s life will be taken because of their sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for their blood.’

Ezekiel 33:2-6

 

 

intelNews.org

Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying

LadyRaven's Whisky In A Jar - OH!

Coffee? Tea? Whisky! - Aspirin anyone?

Stately McDaniel Manor

Culture, Politics, Firearms, Education, Literature, Philosophy, Music, And Other Musings

High Heels and Handguns

This princess is armed- The prince can't always be there to rescue you

Sheeple: People unable to think for themselves

Here to help educate the Sheeple before the slaughter

Reality Check

American Patriot's Reality Check

The Firewall

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it

The Radio Patriot

Because I have so many words...

Eatgrueldog

Where misinformation stops and you are force fed the truth III

Reality Of Christ

Christian, End Time, and Conspiracy News!

DAYLIGHT DISINFECTANT

DAN SANDINI'S NEWS OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM

The Longwood Institute

A site dedicated to the appreciation of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness along with the responsibilities these God-given unalienable rights invoke.

Ten Smiths Blog

What does the Declaration of Independence really say?

Deaconmatson's Blog

observations from America

Fighting For Liberty

LEARN FROM HISTORY OR BE DAMNED BY IT

Stiletto Momma

Balancing the high heels of life.

The DiploMad 2.0

All it takes is a spark

WINTERY KNIGHT

...integrating Christian faith and knowledge in the public square