Benghazi… as it really happened

Benghazi… as it really happened.

Advertisements

Perspective

I have spent hours and thousands of words on this blog now, but sometimes it takes just a few minutes to regain perspective in life.  I took some unannounced down time with this writing intentionally so I could be certain that I wanted to continue and not just writing out of habit.

The conclusion I came to is that I must.  I don’t claim any special enlightenment or anything of that sort, but I will continue to endeavor to filter current events and social issues of the time through the lens of Truth.  I am unabashed and will continue to speak that Truth regardless if one or one thousand people read it because the Truth must be spoken and I am willing to bear it.

“Son of man, go now to the people of Israel and speak my words to them. You are not being sent to a people of obscure speech and strange language, but to the people of Israel— not to many peoples of obscure speech and strange language, whose words you cannot understand. Surely if I had sent you to them, they would have listened to you. But the people of Israel are not willing to listen to you because they are not willing to listen to me, for all the Israelites are hardened and obstinate. But I will make you as unyielding and hardened as they are. I will make your forehead like the hardest stone, harder than flint. Do not be afraid of them or terrified by them, though they are a rebellious people.”

Ezekiel 3:4-9

I want to revisit something I have written about extensively already – Benghazi and the attack and coverup of the murder of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other American citizens during an eight hour attack and siege of the consulate and nearby CIA annex.

In Scripture, David lured a married woman to bed with him and then in order to hide his indiscretion, he ordered her husband betrayed on the battlefield.  The fate of Uriah the Hittite in 2 Samuel 11 and Ambassador Stevens appears to be extremely similar and I for one firmly believe that we, as humans, are extremely prone to repeating history and the same mistakes and sins over and over throughout time.

What has been extensively written on and theorized, but not publicly avowed by the Administration, is that Ambassador Stevens was a conduit for the President, via the State Department, to provide weapons and aid, in contravention of United States Law and international treaties, to the Syrian rebels (Gamage, Information Clearing House; Kelley, Business Insider).

So the question still lingers – what purpose did denying reinforcements to Benghazi serve?  Qui bono?  What motive would the Ambassador’s death serve?

As I already explored only the National Command Authority can order the military – especially a theater commander – to stand down when a call of distress is issued.  So either Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta or President Barack Obama issued that order.  Again I ask qui bono?

For more on this issue and a full break down of the chain of command involved, as well as some more background on the odd way General Carter Ham (Commanding General, AFRICOM) was relieved of duty in the midst of the attack, I recommend more reading here.

Words and Deeds

Months back, eight months specifically, I wrote about Benghazi.

Killed in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.

Killed in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.

 

On September 11th, 2012, the United States Consulate in Benghazi, Libya was laid siege, bombarded with weapons fire, and attacked by a coordinated, deliberate assault force.  The United States Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens was killed by the assault along with State Department Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith.

Killed in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.

Killed in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.

All indications at that time and after the fact indicate that an organized attack had been initiated against the consulate.  What their motivations were, their targets, and how far they

 

would have pressed the attack is unknown because of stonewalling on the part of the Obama Administration.  They intentionally obfuscated the situation by insinuating that a YouTube video was to blame for enraging muslim sensibilities.  Even weeks after the event when nearly every indicator, exchanged correspondence, and every witness was shouting that it was a military-style attack rather than a riot run out-of-control.

Regardless of the facts, the Administration pressed on with their false narrative, not because the truth was too much for the public to handle, but because at that point in time, the Presidential race was in it’s final sixty days.  President Obama’s reelection was at-risk by bad news, especially in the War on Terror, which he claimed was being won because of the death of Osama bin Laden, and the narrative that al Qaeda was badly wounded and on the run.  In early September, national polling results showed Mitt Romney beginning to pull even with President Obama.

I was not in the room so all I can do is speculate at this point.

Were these two men sacrificial lambs on the altar of a national election?

If a military rescue team was dispatched and failed, would President Obama face the same criticism President Carter faced for the failed military rescue of the American citizens and diplomatic officers held hostage in Iran in the late 1970s?

Was something insidious going on out of the consulate in Benghazi that required the response forces to be withheld from intervening?

When requests for permission to dispatch special forces units to enact a counterassault and rescue operation (express missions that SEALs, DELTA, Force Recon, and other special forces units specifically train to execute) why were orders to stand down issued not once, but twice?

Why did security personnel from our embassy in Tripoli, Libya (the same distance from Benghazi as the nearest US military base – Souda Bay Naval Base) have to violate direct orders to not intervene, commandeer an aircraft, and fly to Benghazi in order to reinforce the beleaguered survivors?

Why are the survivors’ identities being withheld from Congress?

This charade has far surpassed a political motivated cloaking of the truth.  This has every scent and indication of a coverup of something monumental.

With all respect, the fact is we have four dead Americans was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?

Then-Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton

Because motive matters Hillary, not just the motives of the attackers, but the motives of the administration and all of the players involved that have intentionally mislead the public in the aftermath.

Either you have lying to disguise complete incompetence at the State Department, the Department of Defense, and the White House itself, or you have lying to disguise the cold calculus of a politically-motivated decision to allow the death of a US Ambassador, Foreign Service Officer, and the deaths of two men who violated orders, former US Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, in order to protect the President’s reelection chances.

In the aftermath, the Administration essentially ran-out-the-clock on Benghazi prior to the election.

So, Hillary, it matters a great deal.

To steal a quote from V for Vendetta:

If our own government was responsible for the deaths of almost a hundred thousand four people… would you really want to know?

LadyRaven's Whisky In A Jar - OH!

Coffee? Tea? Whisky! - Aspirin anyone?

Stately McDaniel Manor

Culture, Politics, Firearms, Education, Literature, Philosophy, Music, And Other Musings

High Heels and Handguns

This princess is armed- The prince can't always be there to rescue you

Sheeple: People unable to think for themselves

Here to help educate the Sheeple before the slaughter

Fellowship of the Minds

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

Reality Check

American Patriot's Reality Check

The Firewall

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it

Freedom Is Just Another Word...

Rules?? What Are rules? I don't need no stinking rules!!!

Evil of indifference

"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. " from Boondock Saints

The Radio Patriot

Because I have so many words...

Eatgrueldog

Where misinformation stops and you are force fed the truth III

Reality Of Christ

Christian, End Time, and Conspiracy News!

DAYLIGHT DISINFECTANT

DAN SANDINI'S NEWS OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM

WR2A: The Line In The Sand

We Are the Second Amendment, and you cannot stop that.

The Longwood Institute

A site dedicated to the appreciation of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness along with the responsibilities these God-given unalienable rights invoke.

Ten Smiths Blog

What does the Declaration of Independence really say?

Short Little Rebel

Because loving Christ is the most rebellious thing you can do

Deaconmatson's Blog

observations from America

America: Going Full Retard...

Word: They are acting. They are creating. They are framing their reality around you. And we … we bark at the end of our leashes. Our ambition for freedumb is at the end of our leash.