The topic of “gender identity” is a hugely controversial issue right now being pushed by the politically correct. If you even think about questioning it you’re automatically seen as insensitive and…
Posted by cyclimus on September 14, 2016
Recently my wife has begun writing, from a Christian perspective, about popular culture – music, books, movies, etc. Her premise has been that the soul cries out to God even if the person doesn’t yet realize it. We have long talked about how, if you listen carefully, you can hear the questions, the pains, the need for the Creator within the secular words and stories told as the author, performer, or director as they try to put the cries of the soul into their work. It’s a wonderful way to speak with people about God and the longing of their hearts and souls, via questions that often can be broken down into “I wonder why…” or “I wonder how…” that open the door from concepts that are easier to speak about with nonbelievers to concepts of God that are harder to explain and even harder to understand without a baseline understanding that believers are blessed, hopefully, to have already.
Applying this to another part of life is the application of popular culture to understand current events. With that said, the event I want to talk about is the Donald Trump phenomenon. Donald Trump is a businessman who decided to run for President. He’s running as a Republican and has entranced many conservatives to his bandwagon, yet the concepts he talks about and the words he uses are those of a liberal demagogue. He identified a yearning in the American public and he is playing to it perfectly.
Americans are angry at the government, at politicians, at men and women who promise the moon and then either fail to deliver, or turn around and do exactly the op opposite of what they promised in the first place.
Americans are angry at a lack of justice.
- Justice under the law (Trump’s initial rise can be directly attributed to the hard line he took on illegal immigration and the promise to punish law breakers and “send them back” and promises of building a wall that another country will finance – never mind that we would have to declare war on Mexico in order to force them to pay for it.) Also, the criminality of actions by politicians such as Hillary Clinton – lying about the contents of a private, unpermitted, unsecured, and unprotected email server in her home during her time as Secretary of State in order to avoid the documentation preservation rules for all Federal government appointees and employees – used to be called what they are under the color of law – espionage and fraud. When oaths and laws mean nothing, the law-abiding grow angry.
- Social justice (the intolerance of the tolerance movement is something I’ve written about before as there are “activists” that aren’t just happy with being permitted to do what they please, but rather want you to celebrate their behavior and their uniqueness as superior to your own – gay marriage/adoption movements, Black Lives Matter, and other such movements fall into this camp squarely. It has even got so absurd that “All Lives Matter” has been called a racist phrase because Black Lives are apparently more equal than yours. When you are told that you are worth less and someone else is worth more for any reason is racism whether you are black, white, yellow, red, or green. There is no justice when ANYONE is elevated above another and the aggrieved grow angry.
- Economic justice (When banks deemed “too big to fail” are given money via the Federal Reserve, which increases the volume of money thus decreasing the value of money and robbing everyone of stored wealth and income, there is a growing feeling of a economic aristocracy. When businesses, with politicians beholden to them for campaign contributions and future employment as lobbyists, have laws and taxes written on their behalf to squash competition in the open market or to have the economic advantage of a decreased tax burden comparatively to others in the same market – the government is seen as picking winners and losers. When good hard-working people lose their jobs because their businesses are regulated out of existence due to profitability problems, when good hard-working people lose their homes because banks deemed “too big to fail” and given money freely to avoid their seemingly inevitable bankruptcies won’t rewrite the terms of their mortgages and force a family into destitution how can there be anything other than a growing anger.
I’m sure you sense a theme now. Anger is growing in this country. It is palatable now. There’s no sense of courtesy anymore. No consideration of the other person. No compassion. What is your first reaction when someone does something unexpected on the road while you’re driving? Cursing, yelling, honking, aggressively driving with a vendetta toward the other person? Are these symptoms of love or anger? I think the answer is obvious.
With this in mind, consider this quote from the great sage of film, Yoda.
“Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.”
We have passed the point of fear. The fear is there, but it is deeper, it is foundational. The fear that our country, our way of life, is changing permanently. That the freedoms, rights, and privileges we hold as Americans are lessening, not growing. This is true whether you politically are left or right of center. There is fear that our jobs are not secure. There is fear that an economic wall is not just being built, but has been built by those in the highest tier to prevent anyone that they don’t want from joining their ranks. There is fear that everything that has been accepted as given for so long is simply not so, and the fear is that if the givens are no longer constant, than how can we function without playing “the game.”
Fear leads to anger.
History can be our guide here because the world has seen rises to power like this in the past. The circumstances of today closely mirror the circumstances of another time and the leaders that can spring out of times like these can restore us or drag us down into darkness.
- Long-term bitterness makes brazen, bully-like tactics appealing as they see the candidate, in this case Trump, as their champion.
- Ineffective government and laws give the perception of dual justice systems where certain crimes are excused for those deemed “worthy.” Equal justice demands equal enforcement, so when selective enforcement is practiced openly faith in the government, police, legislators, and courts is eroded.
- The usage of money by bureaucrats and politicians to enact personal policy via businesses, lobbying groups, and induced behavior (such as enforced purchases under pain of penalty – The Affordable Care Act mandates ALL people buy health insurance because they were born) reeks of corruption and tyranny.
- The 24/7 news cycle and unmitigated lying and misleading by politicians (answering one question they want to answer instead of the question asked for instance) has lead to a soundbite culture that hinges not on ideas, but on emotions. It is not a far leap from there to attaching those negative emotions to a race of people, or a political belief, in order to ratchet up anger specifically directed.
- The Cult of Personality around Mr. Trump is one in which his most ardent supporters don’t care what he says, does, or could do. They support him fully, leading them to attack those that disagree verbally and, in some cases, physically.
Anger Leads to Hate
The time-period that I referenced above is the 1920s and 1930s in what was then called the Wiemar Republic. We know it now as Pre-Nazi Germany. The same conditions and cultural conditions were in place then as now. I’m not claiming Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler, but the comparisons are worth considering. At what point does he, or his bandwagon turn from expressions of anger to expressions of hate. At what point do the long knives come out?
Hate Leads to Suffering
The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
I don’t sense any of the these attributes in Donald Trump, or anyone I’ve met who truly believes he is the best candidate for President this year.
I don’t argue to change your vote, your preference, or anything like that, but I do ask that you, regardless of who you support this year, to examine WHY you support them.
Are you making a decision out of fear? Anger? Hate? Suffering? Do decisions made in the heat of passion or despair ever work out well?
Posted by cyclimus on April 4, 2016
One of mine and my wife’s biggest grievances is the redefinition or misuse of words and phrases.
Whether these redefinitions or misusage is intentional or accidental is aside from the point. The fact of the matter is that meaning and understanding are not possible when the terms used for meaning and understanding are constantly shifting.
2 + 2 always equals 4, unless you redefine 2 to mean 2.1. It’s not really that different after all, but 2.1 + 2.1 doesn’t equal 4. It equals 4.2. It’s a rounding error really. Get over it. Just because words aren’t mathematical absolutes doesn’t alter the process and endgame of all this redefining.
Today I read this:
“Medicare-for-all is civilization. Campaign finance reform is civilization. Funding education is civilization. Progressive taxation is civilization. Dialing back the use of war is civilization”
What is civilization?
According to Merriam-Webster civilization is defined as follows: a relatively high level of cultural and technological development; the stage of cultural development at which writing and the keeping of written records is attained the culture characteristic of a particular time or place
1a : a relatively high level of cultural and technological development;specifically : the stage of cultural development at which writing and the keeping of written records is attainedb : the culture characteristic of a particular time or place
2: the process of becoming civilized
3a : refinement of thought, manners, or tasteb : a situation of urban comfort
The stage of human social development and organization that is considered most advanced:they equated the railroad with progress and civilization
The process by which a society or place reaches an advanced stage of social development and organization.
The society, culture, and way of life of a particular area:the great books of Western civilization the early civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt
The comfort and convenience of modern life, regarded as available only in towns and cities:the fur traders moved further and further from civilization
Writers, philosophers, lawyers, and cultural icons for millenia have used word redefinition to bring about cultural shifts and change opinions.
Redefinition doesn’t change the original meaning of a word or term, it just changes how you use it and how others hear or read it. Culturally everyone usually is on the same page, but the problem really begins to rear it’s head when cultural schisms happen.
Conservatives believe one thing. Liberals another.
Urbanites speak one way and countryfolk another.
Everyone speaks the same language, but with diverging philosophies and understandings of the world at large. Words become very important to maintain a common
When the words we use are redefined or misused, that disconnect becomes increasingly more difficult to bridge because the meanings that both sides of that divide also differ.
Let’s go back to the civilization definition that I read today. That definition is not what you find in the dictionary, but it is the understanding of the liberal left in America today. The problem arises in that I, as a libertarian-leaning conservative, do not agree with the statement in whole or in part.
Medicare-for-all is civilization – forcing me to pay for someone else’s poor health decisions throughout life or lack of motivation to find an economically viable job in order to afford their own cost of care is slavery by taxation. You, via the government, are forcing me to work and use the money I earn from that work to pay for someone else who chooses not to work or chose to destroy their body by smoking, banging, drugging, or drinking their life away. Simply no. That isn’t civilization. That is barbarism, not unlike Vikings raiding prosperous farming communities because they didn’t want to work as hard and could “take” rather than “make.”
Campaign finance reform is civilization – Really? Legislating how someone spends their money (and yes, corporations are made up of people) is the opposite of civilization. It is no different from the King “permitting” someone to petition the king knowing full well that that permission can be withdrawn ex post facto (after the fact) and the subject being fully subservient of the king and his life and speech are not free.
Funding education is civilization – I’ll admit that this one I can at least somewhat understand, but education though takes many forms. Apprenticeships gave us some of the most brilliant thinkers in the world and many modern conveniences. Higher education today has brought us runaway student loan debt and educational outcomes that aren’t reliant on the number of dollars spent per student. Further, the question of where that funding comes from and who controls it is the real crux of this issue? Is it really the best education if it comes from the top down (Common Core) and all students are to be taught to the exact same standards without deviation for talent in one field or another?
Progressive taxation is civilization. Is it? Punishing one group in order to reward the other? How is this different from feudal lords requiring a percentage of the serfs crops for “protection”? Using law to punish high wage earners is no different than economic slavery. Progressive taxation is the exact opposite of due process when you really think about it. All are not equal in the eyes of the law if progressive taxation is the law of the land because then some are “more” equal than others. True equality would be a tax burden not divided proportionately, but rather levied as a percentage of income equal regardless of how much you make (the millionaire and the pensioner alike pay 10% of their income – a flat tax).
Dialing back the use of war is civilization. This summary statement is just too broad to agree or disagree with. Is war overused? Yes. Are some wars necessary? Yes. Can there be diplomatic peace between one nation and another that has sworn the destruction of the first? Not a lasting one because there is no middle ground between the two. This is no different morally than a woman telling her raper to only rape her halfway so they can go their separate ways. It’s not going to work that way… it never does. The only recourse for the “victim” nation or woman is to shoot their attacker in the face – to exert the ultimate deterrent force through the best, most effective, and most economic means at their disposal. To do any less is to tell the offender that their life or nation is superior to one’s own.
So the statement made completely added to what is known as civilization. Is civilization not dependent on steadfast standards, definitions, laws, and justice?
Is not the veneer of civilization threatened when the laws are twisted to allow what was once illegal?
Is not the veneer of civilization threatened when justice is denied or unequal based on who you are, what you are worth, or who you know?
You can’t redefine words, because the underlying truths remain unchanged. Redefining the words alone does not make anything true, rather it denies the truth much like Orwell’s opus 1984 states
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
Posted by cyclimus on February 3, 2016
Absolutely fantastic point by point breakdown of why arms are so quintessential not only to freedom and liberty, but why they are essential from a logical perspective as well.
A gun reality (an unedited work puke)
I have watched with great interest the response of our elected officials and those known as the “liberal left” in response to the recent terrorist attacks in France and the United States.
Gun control and more infringement of our Second amendment rights is their consistent demand.
I can appreciate their right to opinion and belief. I would never attack someone for their closely held beliefs, no matter how poorly thought out or wrong I believe them to be.
Here are a few issues I believe need deeper thought and self-assessment:
- Average police response times in our country is 10 minutes.
- A lot of bad stuff can happen in 10 minutes
- If someone is bursting into your home, church, workplace, business, etc., you have seconds to react and respond – not minutes.
- What is the best use for those precious seconds?
- Fumbling with your…
View original post 1,275 more words
Posted by cyclimus on December 8, 2015
The New York Times published an article detailing what they think makes a “modern” man. Most of their “definitions” are benign, and some I even agree with (such as the bit about not cutting fat off your steak and eating the entire thing). One in particular struck me…
25. The modern man has no use for a gun. He doesn’t own one, and he never will.
Wow. That isn’t just a philosophical bungle, it is flat out a denial of man’s role as the defender of his family, and of the physically weak. Luke 22:36 expressly records Jesus Christ instructing his closest disciples to sell their cloak, their most prized personal possession and their identification of status in Jewish society, and purchase a sword. With Christ there are always multiple interpretations of what He said, but one cannot ignore the very literal words spoken in order to read into a statement what you want to see. Sell your clothes… buy a weapon. Not a spear, or a bow… a sword. The sword was the equivalent of the modern firearm.
Jesus Christ instructed his followers to arm themselves so that they could defend themselves and each other. There are other deeper meanings as well, but let’s just stick with the literal words spoken because it seems that the New York Times just said that Jesus was wrong because according to them, a real manly man doesn’t need to have the ability to defend themselves or someone else. Considering the source I shouldn’t be surprised. Don’t mind that, if not for someone with a [gatling] gun, that joke of a paper would have been burned to the ground by a riotous mob back in the 19th century.
I argue that the NYT is flat wrong and here is why…
“The Gun Is Civilization” By Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret)
Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.
In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.
The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.
There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat – it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.
People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.
Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.
People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.
The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.
When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation… And that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)
Posted by cyclimus on October 1, 2015
Years ago I stood in a quiet Pennsylvania field. It was as beautiful that day as it was today, and as it was fourteen years ago. I had my oldest son with me there. He was just 3 years old and didn’t know why just being there was terribly difficult. He didn’t understand the long granite path into a field that seemingly held nothing. I didn’t tell him that day that free men and women died in that field not that long ago in the most recent shots of a clash of civilizations because he didn’t yet have the maturity to understand. Funny thing is that the joy of taking a walk with his dad was infectious.
There was sadness and grief there, but there was also joy. Joy in the bright sunshine and perfectly cloudless blue sky. Joy in the quiet solitude of the field and the trees beyond. Joy in the eyes of a child and the new place.
I have said before that I have learned so much more about God after becoming a father. That day God used my son to teach me a lesson that I knew intellectually, but had never really thought through.
I knew the moment that I first saw the towers burning that Americans were dying at the hands of a mortal enemy. I knew that moment that my life and everyone’s lives would change forever. I was sad for my country and grieved the loss of life. That grief turned to anger, as it did for many.
What I didn’t know was that God was setting me up for that day years later in that field – so that I might finally understand this:
You have turned for me my mourning into dancing;
you have loosed my sackcloth
and clothed me with gladness,
that my glory may sing your praise and not be silent.
O Lord my God, I will give thanks to you forever!
Posted by cyclimus on September 11, 2015
The 2nd Amendment codified a pre-existent right to self-defense, born of our right to exist (all men possess the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness). If you (as a government agent, or individually) elect to deny any of those rights, I have an intrinsic right that precedes the written Constitution to defend those rights with every tool at my disposal up to and including lethal force.
The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting. It’s not about my right to keep a 12-gauge single shot in the closet. It is about my right to say when you ignore my vote, ignore the rule of law, ignore the rulings of the jury and push and push and push until my life or liberty is threatened, that I still have the right to vote… with a rifle, a shotgun, a handgun, or whatever other force of arms I can muster to myself. So go ahead, make your proclamations Bernie and voice your opinion, something tells me that when push comes to shove, the standard bearers of the palladium of liberty will meet you and your kind and you are deathly afraid of that fact.
Posted by cyclimus on September 8, 2015
Outrage. Vile. Evil. The terrible racist roots of Planned Parenthood aside (the extermination of African American babies within America – don’t take my word for it – go look up Margaret Sanger), the videos being released just keep showing the absolute depravity of this organization.
The subjects of the video are cold, heartless, callous individuals. They joke about the deaths of babies. They negotiate prices for parts of these corpses – nevermind that selling those parts (for profit or not) is wildly illegal. The depths of these videos puts the top-to-bottom depravity of PP on full display.
As a Christian, a Christ follower, I am astonished at the absolute callousness of these videos. I am shocked that such behavior is not only tolerated within PP, but also finds defenders on the outside. I am shocked, but then I am also reminded that all sin and fall short of the glory and righteousness of God. Evil resides in every human heart. While the cry for justice is on our tongues, the prayer of redemption and grace for the men and women in these videos must be also.
I don’t know why, but the Book of Micah seems applicable in light of these terrible revelations.
The godly has perished from the earth,
and there is no one upright among mankind;
they all lie in wait for blood,
and each hunts the other with a net.
Their hands are on what is evil, to do it well;
the prince and the judge ask for a bribe,
and the great man utters the evil desire of his soul;
thus they weave it together.
The best of them is like a brier,
the most upright of them a thorn hedge.
The day of your watchmen, of your punishment, has come;
now their confusion is at hand.
Put no trust in a neighbor;
have no confidence in a friend;
guard the doors of your mouth
from her who lies in your arms;
for the son treats the father with contempt,
the daughter rises up against her mother,
the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law;
a man’s enemies are the men of his own house.
But as for me, I will look to the Lord;
I will wait for the God of my salvation;
my God will hear me.
Posted by cyclimus on July 31, 2015
Edmund, Oklahoma. Stockton, California. Killeen, Texas. Iowa City, Iowa. Olivehurst, California. San Francisco, California. Garden City, New York. Jonesboro, Arkansas. Columbine, Colorado. Fort Worth, Texas. Honolulu, Hawaii. Santee, California. Tucson, Arizona. Meridian, Mississippi. Red Lake Indian Reservation, Minnesota. Nickel Mines, Pennsylvania. Blacksburg, Virginia. Omaha, Nebraska. Dekalb, Illinois. Binghamton, New York. Fort Hood, Texas. Huntsville, Alabama. Seal Beach, California. Oakland, California. Aurora, Colorado. Oak Creek, Wisconsin. Newtown, Connecticut. Santa Monica, California. Washington, D.C. Fort Hood, Texas (again). Isla Vista, California. Charleston, South Carolina. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
I’m sure you’ve heard of these places… they are all cities that played host to a mass shooting, an active shooter, or a Jihadi attack. Hundreds dead and wounded when you sum them up.
Causation is hard to predict for each of these as motives differ as wildly as criminal insanity to Islamic extremism with a smattering of perceived revenge motives mixed in too. There is one correlation that MUST be drawn from the proliferation of mass shootings.
In each case above, the lawful carrying of firearms by law abiding citizens were banned in such locations either by federal or state law (universities, schools, churches, military installations), or by prohibition by business owners (the ubiquitous “No Guns” sign).
There is no denying the simple truth that the overwhelming majority of these shootings are perpetrated specifically in locations where immediate armed self-defense is not available to the true first responders – the victims.
Any property owner or lawmaker that fails to account for this nearly universal correlating factor is being criminally negligent by prohibiting a fundamental human right – that of self-defense.
Posted by cyclimus on July 17, 2015
By now everyone in America is aware of the tragic events in Charleston the other day. Since and in the coming days we as a nation have choices to make. We will choose to judge, hate, fear, legislate, and either draw closer to or push away others. We will either fall victim to the fear of similar events in our own communities. Churchgoers will look over their shoulders more often and watch outsiders critically out of fear.
fear not, for I am with you;
be not dismayed, for I am your God;
I will strengthen you, I will help you,
I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.
We have already seen politicians trying to leverage the blood of these men and women for their own particular myopic view of what’s wrong with this country – namely what they think is the over-proliferation of guns despite the statistics that demonstrably have proven that more guns has not led to more crime, but rather the marked decrease in violent crime.
Others will grab on to the killer’s racial motives and say that this is an example of the extreme racism prevalent within society. They will say that this is a more common problem and that this particular tragedy is just the latest example of it.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave[a] nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
These knee-jerk reactions don’t capture the problem though, and it is the problem we all have. We live in a world of darkness, of hate, of violence, of evil, and sin. But, the good news is for all of us, and that is that the brightest light is possible from the deepest darkness. It is in fact not only possible, for God uses evil for ultimate good.
68 “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel,
for he has visited and redeemed his people
69 and has raised up a horn of salvation for us
in the house of his servant David,
70 as he spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets from of old,
71 that we should be saved from our enemies
and from the hand of all who hate us;
72 to show the mercy promised to our fathers
and to remember his holy covenant,
73 the oath that he swore to our father Abraham, to grant us
74 that we, being delivered from the hand of our enemies,
might serve him without fear,
75 in holiness and righteousness before him all our days.
76 And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Most High;
for you will go before the Lord to prepare his ways,
77 to give knowledge of salvation to his people
in the forgiveness of their sins,
78 because of the tender mercy of our God,
whereby the sunrise shall visit us[h] from on high
79 to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the way of peace.”
11 If I say, “Surely the darkness shall cover me,
and the light about me be night,”
12 even the darkness is not dark to you;
the night is bright as the day,
for darkness is as light with you.
“I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”
The righteous man perishes,
and no one lays it to heart;
devout men are taken away,
while no one understands.
For the righteous man is taken away from calamity;
2 he enters into peace
While it is tragic that people had to lose their lives, we should rest assured that they died at peace righteous and redeemed. What an evil men wrought God will turn into something beautiful – and I suspect that it will begin today, with love, not hate, politics, or legislation, in Charleston. From deepest darkness the light of Christ shines brightest.
Pray for those left behind, thank God for the grace that covers us all, and praise Jesus for reaching though time and gathering all sin to himself so that all men, women, and children of all ages and all nations are redeemed in the Father’s sight – even the man holding the gun the other night.
Posted by cyclimus on June 19, 2015